From 9f575aad5b4ac55eb3d6a7d66cc2986946568c94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: patrick-mcdougle Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:35:37 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed wording on the Alice and Bob Optimistic locking example. --- en/reference/transactions-and-concurrency.rst | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/en/reference/transactions-and-concurrency.rst b/en/reference/transactions-and-concurrency.rst index 56a9c7db7..0a752ad5b 100644 --- a/en/reference/transactions-and-concurrency.rst +++ b/en/reference/transactions-and-concurrency.rst @@ -264,9 +264,8 @@ Important Implementation Notes ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You can easily get the optimistic locking workflow wrong if you -compare the wrong versions. Say you have Alice and Bob accessing a -hypothetical bank account: - +compare the wrong versions. Say you have Alice and Bob editing a +hypothetical blog post: - Alice reads the headline of the blog post being "Foo", at optimistic lock version 1 (GET Request)